|
Disability Insurance
Our attorneys represent policy owners in
litigation against major disability insurers. Disability
insurance provides income payments to the insured when income is
interrupted or terminated because of illness, sickness or accident.
The Problem
Until the early 1990s, disability insurance companies aggressively
marketed disability insurance to professionals like doctors and
lawyers. The policies included many "bells and
whistles" like the following:
|
Investigation |
|
If you have a problem with your disability policy please
contact us. |
- favorable pricing;
- the policy cannot be canceled by the insurance company so long
as the insured pays the premium;
- the policy is guaranteed to be renewable each year by the
insured;
- when renewed, the premium remains level and cannot be increased
by the insurance company;
- the policy protects the insured in the event he or she cannot
perform her occupation;
- the policy may further protect the insured in the event he or
she cannot perform his or her particular specialty such as
emergency medicine, surgery, or litigation.
In the mid-1990s it became clear that the insurance companies had
grossly underestimated the number of claims. Insureds who were once
young and healthy began to reach the 45 to 55-year-old age range and
began becoming disabled in large numbers. This increase in claims
included emerging medical conditions and syndromes that the insurance
industry had not considered when the policies were written. Diseases
and conditions ranging from carpal tunnel syndrome, fibromyalgia,
chronic fatigue syndrome, Epstein-Barr virus related conditions, and
various mental disorders made their appearance in a vigorous way.
Occupations previously thought to be at low risk for disabling injury
suddenly became insurance mine-fields. To aggravate the problem many
of the medical conditions had few available treatments and were
incorrectly viewed by the industry as purely subjective conditions
with little or no objective evidence.
As claims mounted, many insurance companies stopped writing
disability policies altogether and those who remained in the business
drastically cut back their product portfolio. Those still
selling disability insurance consolidated. In fact, UnumProvident, the
nation's largest disability insurer, is the result of a merger between
UNUM, Provident and Paul Revere. UnumProvident, now sells or
administers the majority disability insurance policies in the
US.
The new policies are not as generous and now feature limitations
and exclusions to limit exposure. The policies are now
cancelable, premiums may be raised in certain situations, benefits are
capped at age 65, and they may require rehabilitation programs before
benefits are paid. For claims involving certain mental disorders or
other conditions the benefits may be limited to two years.
Consolidation and changes to product offerings however, were not
enough to stop the money being hemorrhaged by insurance
companies. Some companies embarked upon aggressive efforts to
cut-off payments.
Often disability insurers go too far and engage in bad faith
tactics to avoid honoring a contract. For example, between 1992 and
2002 there have been an estimated 10,000 lawsuits for denial of claims
against UnumProvident. Recently, UnumProvident was the subject
of investigations by the prime-time television news magazines Dateline
and 60 Minutes.
Illegal Tactics
The laws of many states declare the following tactics to be
illegal:
- Giving greater weight to the interest of the insurance company
over the interest of the insured;
- Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable
investigation based upon all available information;
- Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair and
equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become
reasonably clear;
- Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts
due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than
the amounts ultimately recovered in actions brought by such
insureds;
- Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a
reasonable person would have believed that person's own self was
entitled by reference to written or printed advertising material
accompanying or made part of an application.
For information concerning sanctions levied against one disability
insurer, UNUMProvident Corporation, in particular
click here.
If your disability benefits were denied or cut-off by your insurer
please
contact
us for more information.
|