Race Based Premium - Life Insurance Litigation
On the heels of the market conduct
litigation and regulatory investigations of the 1990's, a new picture
of the life insurance industry is emerging. African-American policy
owners are now learning that decades ago insurance companies charged
them more for life insurance policies than they charged Caucasians.
Much worse, the racial discrimination continues today.
Discriminatory premiums are too
frequently encountered in low face value life insurance policies
called "Industrial" or "burial" policies. Typically, these policies
pay a death benefit of less than $10,000 -- often $1,000 or less.
Premium payments for these policies were typically $1.00 or less per
week. The premium was collected at the policy owners home by an agent
handling a "debit" route.
The premium rates for life
insurance policies are determined using mortality tables. In the
1930's and early 1940's the insurance industry began to develop
mortality tables for industrial life insurance policies which resulted
in African-Americans paying more for the same life insurance policies
sold to Caucasians. The discriminatory tables were based upon
mortality data which, according to some actuaries, justified a
distinction between the races. In fact, in a widely disseminated 1896
publication, the Chief Statistician of Prudential Insurance Company
laid the foundation for decades of discrimination by concluding:
It is not in the condition of
life, but in the race traits and tendencies [of African-Americans]
that we find the causes of the excessive mortality. . . . Is it not
self-evident that it is the working of the law of physiological
heredity rather than the effects of environment that we have here to
deal with?
Most life insurers, using
industry-sponsored and created mortality tables, began issuing
low-face value policies with exorbitant premiums. While this practice
largely faded out by the mid-1960's, some insurers then embarked upon
a more subtle yet equally discriminatory method of discrimination
called "socio-economic" underwriting. Here, insureds who lived in a
certain part of town or who held certain jobs (not necessarily more
hazardous ones), were charged more for their insurance. The effect,
once again, was that African-Americans paid more for life insurance.
The effects of this discrimination
continue today. While the life insurance companies are no longer
selling policies with increased premiums for African-Americans and may
no longer engage in "socio-economic" underwriting, they are still
collecting the discriminatory premiums on policies sold decades ago.
Parry Deering Futscher & Sparks
represents owners of industrial or "burial" policies in a number of
actions throughout the United States.
The following is a listing of the
cases in which Parry Deering Futscher & Sparks is currently involved
representing the plaintiff or the
class. Follow the links below
for more information about a particular case.
-
Bratcher, et al. v. National
Standard Life Insurance Company, et al.
U.S. District Court,
Middle District of Florida, Case No. 8:99-cv-2807-T-23B,
Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL Docket
NO. 1371
-
Brown, et al. v. American National
Insurance Company
U.S. District Court,
Eastern District of Oklahoma, Case No. 6:00-cv-00275,
Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL Docket
No. 1391
-
Carnegie, et al. v. Mutual Savings
Life Insurance Company
U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Alabama, Case No. CV 99 S 3292 NE
-
Duncan v. Columbian Protective
Association of Binghamton, New York, et al.
U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York, Case No. 00 Civ 7236
-
Moore, et al. v. Liberty National
Insurance Company
U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Alabama, Case No. CV 99-BU-3262-S
-
Page, et al. v. North Carolina
Mutual Life Insurance Company
U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Illinois, Case No. 00-831-DRH
-
Pugh, et al. v. Jefferson-Pilot
Corporation, et al.
U.S. District Court,
Eastern District of New York, Case No. CV-01-0187
- Singleton v.
The Liberty Life Insurance Company
District of South Carolina
-
Williams,
et al. v. National Security Insurance Company
U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Alabama, Case No. CV-00-H-2737-W
If you
have questions regarding these or other
actions in which Parry Deering Futscher & Sparks, P.S.C., is involved
please
contact us. |